Quote davey37="davey37" Quote davey37="Wildmoose"Didn't look that bad to me, thought he struck Crooks around the collar bone, penalty & talking to seemed sufficient. Tbf I have only seen one angle though, not sure if replays make it look worse. Not understanding the disclipinary here. Burns has been summoned for a grade B but Ryan Bailey has the option of an early plea for a grade C? www.superleague.co.uk/article/27 ... rs-charged'" I suggest you watch it again. Initial impact is with the temple (and Crooks is a TALL lad) and ends up around his neck.'" As I stated I've only seen one angle (the high camera on halfway). This is the only angle on Rovers tv, SL highlights don't show the tackle & SL show isn't on iplayer yet. Pretty inconclusive based on that, need more of a front on view. Travis' arm is swinging horizontal / upwards & Crooks is falling so how does the contact start at the temple & end round the neck?

Quote davey37="davey37" Quote davey37="Wildmoose"Didn't look that bad to me, thought he struck Crooks around the collar bone, penalty & talking to seemed sufficient. Tbf I have only seen one angle though, not sure if replays make it look worse. Not understanding the disclipinary here. Burns has been summoned for a grade B but Ryan Bailey has the option of an early plea for a grade C? www.superleague.co.uk/article/27 ... rs-charged'" I suggest you watch it again. Initial impact is with the temple (and Crooks is a TALL lad) and ends up around his neck.'" As I stated I've only seen one angle (the high camera on halfway). This is the only angle on Rovers tv, SL highlights don't show the tackle & SL show isn't on iplayer yet. Pretty inconclusive based on that, need more of a front on view. Travis' arm is swinging horizontal / upwards & Crooks is falling so how does the contact start at the temple & end round the neck?

Nowt like sitting on the fence

You know me Ginge. As fair as they come!!

That is very true

2 match ban, will miss St Helens and Huddersfield games.

Wasn't the worst tackle but looked pretty malicious the way he swung his arm around and hit crooks in the head. Certainly was never an attempt at a legitimate tackle and he knew what he was doing. He has previous for it so no surprise it's coming out here already. Still, I'm guessing he's probably wishing ganson did send him off

I have not seen one FC fan claim it to be the worst tackle EVER despite what some of you claim.



However, it was bad and should have been punished properly by Ganson.

Fair enough.



Best/worst camera is sky's in SE corner.



Shows how bad it is. And Crooks was NOT falling.

Haven't watched it since, at the time on SKY I thought he was lucky not to get sent off and was a minimum yellow.



I felt he got neither at the time because Ganson was too fat to keep up and get a decent view of the incident.



Two games is what's deserved. I'm not sure you can do that maliciously at that speed, if he can he'll spend most of his time in the stands, it was certainly a bad one but not the worst I've seen. Worst one in recent memory for me was Mathers on King a few years ago.

kr fans saying nothing wrong with it how come hes got a 2 match ban???

Oh my.

What all of them?