he had an unbalanced match and not in our favour.

and the sitaution today was eaxctly why he was right not to send out any of our players on loan



but if there was no one else why couldn't he have put an under 20s forward on the bench rather than a winger?

And if a back got injured?



Agar had to cover all scenarios, having another second rower on the bench when you've already got a backline of Yeaman, Hall, Whiting and Turner would give the side nothing if anyone of those got injured.

Maybe one of the backs was carrying a knock? It made sense to have a back on the bench after the bruising game on Friday.

Manu has played centre. At one point we had Dowes, Radford, O'Meley and Moa all on the pitch. They can't have all been playing prop, so must have been out of position. IMO it would have been more beneficial having another forward, but don't think it would have made any difference anyway.

TKOAH, it's good that you are being even-handed in your assessment of today. I understand that Agar has baffled us in the past with his bench selection and rotations but today was a completely different matter.

Our best player so far this year wasn't playing. Like people say Lyne was hammered by Jodie Broughton so what top players like Hicks and King could of done to the kids confidence. The team benefited more from having Whiting on the wing then it would have having him in LF. Everyone calls from him to play LF but no one has actually seen him play there so no one knows how good he would be, our forwards are our best asset and our team in the middle has been formidable why would you want to change that?

No he hasn't



HTH.

Yes he has.

he's behind you

Here's a shocker .....



But to put Liam Kent into a game against Anderson, Harrison, Morley, Carvell and Wood would have been more damaging than playing Lyne against Wires backs.

Oh no he isn't..