Different day same shiit.

Jake has an opinion, just like the rest of us. To be honest, I find it more tedious when people constantly accuse a fellow fan of 'loving it' when we lose, and other such nonsense. I don't agree with everything (or even most things) that he posts, but he's just as entitled to think Agar is clueless as Wolfie is to think he's the next Wayne Bennett. Personally, I think he's somewhere in between.

Other than the fact Wolfie probably hasn't ever mentioned him being the next 'Wayne Bennett'.......................has he?

Didn't say he had. Just that he was [ientitled[/i to think that.

AND of course they didnt watch both saints games etc either huh??

Entitled, but probably doesn't think that, what do you reckon?

Not got a problem with his thoughts on Agar, I agree every-one is entitled to their opinions but Jake likes to insul and be rude to posters when they do not agree with him, a classic keyboard warrior.

The big difference for me in those 2 comparisons in the standard of the opposition and the motivation of the players.



Saints and Rovers we get up for.



Celtic and Wakey we dont get up for.



There's an issue with our motivation and approach in the lesser games.

And that is where the level of expectation is an issue you see because any and I mean ANY coach in SL would consider 4th place with 5 games to go of the regular season is the TOP level!!

Then its all down to knock out footie which is down to players desire over 80mins not the coach

I don't know what Wolfie thinks, and it's irrelevant to the point I was making. For 'Wolfie' you could read 'withersea zebra', 'Amadeo Avogadro' or anyone else.

Like calling someone 'fooking boring', for example?

Mr Burns in forum argument shocker