Scott has been great in one game last week at centre. He was underwhelming for the other games earlier in season and lost out to Hall and Pratt as a result. 

He played well in second row when asked which I think watching him 2024 at Hull is his strongest position right SR. 


That said last week was promising at centre and it’s his turn to try keep Pratt out now. It’s a good place to be in. 


Agree once Trueman is fit or even Russell gets match fitness they will start at 6 over Max. Max will move back to 1 and Rourke will have to try compete with Max like you say. A tall order with Max been integral to the spine. 


I can see why Powell and the coaches are training Rourke up at wing and centre. It only increases his opportunities of making the 17. I thought he went well in pre season on the wing when he scored a nice try too. 


Opportunities will come no doubt for Rourke. We are blessed to have two very good fullbacks. 

Just watched last Hull try and how he could have Sent it up as a try is baffling.If it had gone up as a no try it would not have been given You could not see the ball .Any body understand what happened with the vido challenge in the second half .I through it was our ball but the ref gave them a free kick..Not blaming ref for a very poor display ,But shows  what damage a 50 /50 call can do

I think that Wakey challenged something, a call of a strip perhaps, which was overturned but in reviewing they spotted at high tackle so it was a successful challenge but still a penalty to Hull.That's just what I surmise happened but I was at the ground and haven't watched the game on TV so I may well be wrong.

If your on about Walmsley. Yes, the ref got the stripping penalty wrong. But Walmsley didn’t hit high I didn’t think. He didn’t hit the chin or head at all and his hand got players shoulder. If I recall the Hull crowd appeared to win that one. Much like the Cust one, that wasn’t high either. You see many arms round shoulders and across collar bone area etc as just regular tackles game in game out. If they were both high and there’s consistency we are back to that silly season where we were seeing countless high penalties last season that quickly got binned off. 

The thing that irks me is when an actual arm to side of face hits Rourke and the VR says clearly there’s head contact.


He then says he got shoulder too so it’s ‘incidental’ and waves play on… I thought head contact with an arm was a straight penalty regardless.


We saw what appeared imo the rules applied differently in the same game. Shouldn’t happen imo. 

I was at the game as well ,enjoyed having the choice to stand up,but was nice to sit in the seat when I needed a rest With all the rails been on every row of seats made it a lot better for a old grumpy man like me to climb the steps to get the top  . Got to give the fans credit they made plenty of noise .Were as the idea of taking of one shoe and waving it in the air  come from .Got to admit enjoyed the night not disappointed at least we were in the game.Did sneak out with 2 minutes left ,no queuing in the car park got back home in about 45 mins

Perhaps we should not be so hard on ourselves following our defeat and Hull.
Sometimes you just have to give credit to the opposition.
Hull have carried on from where they finished against us by demolishing Wigan in the first half.
Sezer has been unplayable, the team have targeted Christian Wade who has had a nightmare first half for the Pies.
Wigan we're losing against the Giants at HT last week before turning it round in the second half.
I suspect their ability to win in the second half will be tested this afternoon against a rampant Hull side.
My heart wants a Wigan win to keep us in the top six but my heart says that a Hull win is likely.