Had a great game. But i agree we have to let him go and move on, its a harsh business at times, but rowley made right choice

Good on the club for letting him play for NW yesterday, but bringing him back on Friday seems like a cheap shot.......ie he's better than most reserves, but nowhere near good enough for first grade.....



Just doesn't sit right with me!



No doubt the "insiders" can tell me how this was allowed to happen!

It's called 'tactics'. Tire him out for Sunday.

Unfortunately the other 16 NWC players weren't eligible to play for us in Friday's GF!

How many lads from around here played for the crusaders on Sunday.

Who's to say that he didn't ask to play on Friday given he's played a number of games for the reserves and is a similar age to a lot of the lads?

And Leythers on the Coaching Staff as well .

I would imagine seeing RYAN played quite a lot of games for the reserves they gave him the choice to play and earn his medal, should we win, simples really. no hidden agenda, he deserved it IMHO. I'm pleased for the lad, he was outstanding in the friendlies early in the season and didn't warrant dropping on his proformances and he has IMHO never let us down, not saying he's better then some of the other props but he's always played well when h'es played and is one for the future, hope to see him back at Leigh one day .

Apparently NWC are being investigated for playing Ryan on Sunday. I think the possible issue is to do with the fact that he returned to Leigh and played in the reserves grand final.

Doesn't there have to be a minimum of 48 hours between games. Can't see that we have complained though

Well surprisingly the unfit Ryan Duffy had two good games.







I still think he should be offered a contract.

Liked your first sentence

Decent squad player, but never going to be first choice. His fitness is nowhere near upto the standard we should be aiming for. If anybody watches the highlights of the leeds game, see who is at fault for Leeds' final try. Ryan Duffy had his back turned and wasn't back in the line. Has a decent offload, takes the ball up hard, but gets put on his back more often than not and can't do the minutes.

The Watcher has been informed that Beaumont & Rowley have disagreed on the future of Duffy. The board member wants to offer the prop a contract that will keep him at Leigh, whilst the coach obviously doesnt rate the young pie eater. Other clubs are interested in taking the big forward, Batley & Whitehaven to name just 2 of them but with the Leigh based agent Mr D Peet now representing Ryan The Watcher hopes he will remain at Leigh & develop into a true Leigh great.

If that's the case then Duffy won't be staying. Beaumont has said many times that Rowley has complete and total control over the squad, who he signs & how they play. I would have quite liked Duffy to stay but we do now have better options for forwards & it wouldn't be fair to keep him and not play him when he’s a very good Championship level player; plus I'm sure Rowley would like to spend the money on someone else that will be playing.