i know.... but i just thought the rfl website would be some fun... and i didn't know that no one would be able to find someone with more than 29.



im sure westwood was not guilty in over 20 of them anyway.

More like what he hasn't done... i.e. develop his brain since the age of 3.

probably knocked on.

You really, really, really can't have been watching Rugby League for very long.

[urlhttp://www.leedsmet.ac.uk/graduation/summer08/index_F7C508C71DA24AB3BB37211D73176158.htm[/url

I don't get it



EDIT: ^ Exactly.

Bailey is an utter cheat, he puts in cheap shots all the time and if you have a look in brawls he is always picks on someone smaller than him. Bailey won't go for a big shot on an opposite prop he'll try and smash the little guy. Westwood is aggressive, did you see his shot on HKR number 8? That was proper rugby.

Must be a better way of deciding the dirtiest player - how about scoring as below:



RFL apperarance - 1 point

Sending off sufficient - 2 points

1 match ban - 3 points

2 match ban - 4 points

3 match ban - 5 points

etc...



(Drug suspensions not included - would skew the results too much!)



Player with the highest number of points would be classed as the dirtiest player.

That's Wigg'n OWNED

BSc (Hons) Sport & Exercise Science? That's hardly improving the brain.



Given the impressive size of his cranium you'd think he'd be harbouring the brain power for neurosurgery or astrophysics or becoming a super villain, or something.

In reply to the original thread subject line, I suppose it depends upon who has the best washing facilities and how often they use them.



It is also related to the areas where they go and the actions they undertake that allows them to accumulate dirt on their body.



From my point of view I think this topic is difficult to answer simply because of all the variables I have mentioned

Surely the dirtiest player in Super League is Joel Monaghan.............after all he got a dog to............well you know the rest.